Photo: Brendan Smialowski/Getty

harry reid

As friends, family and colleagues remember the late Sen. Harry Reid, whodied Tuesday at 82, for his service and leadership in Nevada and the U.S. Senate, one aspect of his legacy is more relevant than ever.

Reid, who passed away after a four-year battle with pancreatic cancer, retired from the Senate in 2017. But he remained outspoken about his desire to eliminate the filibuster, a procedural rule that increases the threshold of votes needed to pass a measure from a simple majority to 60 votes.

In 2019, Reid wrote an op-ed headlined"The Filibuster Is Suffocating the Will of the American People"inThe New York Times, calling on the Senate, where he once led Democrats as majority and minority leader, to “abolish the filibuster in all its forms.”

Reid wrote that the use of the rule to block or delay a vote has turned the Senate into a “unworkable legislative graveyard” because minority politicians — Republicans in particular, he said — have used the filibuster to obstruct.

“The Senate is now a place where the most pressing issues facing our country are disregarded, along with the will of the American people overwhelmingly calling for action. The future of our country is sacrificed at the altar of the filibuster,” Reid wrote.

Alex Wong/Getty Images

us-senate-news

Just last week, PresidentJoe Bidensaid that he supports a change in the rule for voting rights. “If the only thing standing between getting voting rights legislation passed and not getting passed is the filibuster, I support making the exception of voting rights for the filibuster,“he told ABC News' David Muirin an interview on Dec. 22.

Some Democrats would like to do away with the filibuster completely, as Reid suggested, but others see the issue of voting rights as worthy of a “carveout” — or an exception — for the rule.

In 2013, he and his fellow Democrats used the so-called “nuclear option” toget rid of the 60-vote requirementfor most judicial appointments. Four years later, then-Majority Leader Mitch McConnelldid the same for Supreme Court nominees. He cited Reid’s move as the precedent for further change.

Sen. Schumer recently indicated that voting rights legislation will be taken up again soon, perhaps as early as January,The New York Times reportedDec. 20. In a letter to colleagues, he also said the Senate would “consider changes to any rules which prevent us from debating and reaching final conclusion on important legislation.”

All 50 Democrat senators would need to vote in favor of changing a rule, allowing Vice PresidentKamala Harristo break a tie. But it’s unclear if the Democrats can pull it off with two in their party, Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, still reluctant.

source: people.com